Law Alert

In Low Koh Hwa v Persatuan Kanak-Kanak Spastik Selangor & Wilayah Persekutuan and another case [2021] 10 MLJ 262, the High Court set aside an

The cornerstone of arbitration is party autonomy i.e., the freedom of parties to agree to submit disputes to arbitration. This consensus will be embodied in

It is now commonplace for experts to be employed to determine either quantum or delay in construction disputes. O. 40A r. 2 Rules of Court

The case of Yap Seong Yee v Eureka Property Management Sdn Bhd and another appeal [2018] 6 MLJ 799 concerned a dispute over a property transaction.

On the 1st of August 2021, the Asian International Arbitration Centre (‘AIAC’) published the new AIAC Arbitration Rules 2021 (‘2021 Rules’). One of the new

Posco Daewoo Malaysia Sdn Bhd (PDM) entered into 3 credit facility agreements (CFAs) with Tenaga Wan Bersaudara Sdn Bhd (TWB) to finance the importation of

Arbitration is an established form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and has been popular in solving both domestic and international disputes. Like court proceedings, arbitration

Prepared by: Rachel Chong ([email protected]), Corporate Associate at Messrs Chong + Kheng Hoe.

  Prepared by: Rachel Chong ([email protected]), Corporate Associate of Messrs Chong + Kheng Hoe.

‘Strengthening Stakeholder Management and Investor Relations’ is the third digital Guidebook of the Public Listed Companies Transformation (“PLCT”) Programme, published on 19 August 2022. The

In a recent Court of Appeal (COA) case of Lee Kai Wuen & Anor v Lee Yee Wuen [2022] 7 CLJ 505, the COA had

One would imagine that demonstrating initiative is a good virtue. However, the same may not be the case if the person showing initiative happens to

To govern the relationship between the vendor and the purchaser of shares in a private limited company, a share sale agreement (“SSA”) (or, sale and

This article discusses the recent Federal Court decision of The United States of America V. Menteri Sumber Manusia & Ors And Another Appeal [2022] 6

S 37(1)(b)(ii) Arbitration Act 2005 (“AA 2005”) allows the setting aside of an arbitral award where the award is in conflict with the public policy